borgdrone222 0 Posted March 10, 2004 (edited) CRUSHER CREAMS PULASKI BY FAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Edited March 10, 2004 by borgdrone222 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jeanway 0 Posted March 10, 2004 I like them both equally Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tomparis 0 Posted March 11, 2004 I think Crusher was better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Q stole my bike 0 Posted March 11, 2004 PULASKI all the way!!!  I think she was cool, she was a bit like McCoy, that's what I liked about her. And - most important thing - she didn't have an annoying son. I thought the most important thing for you would be that Pulaski never was in love with Picard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fenriz275 0 Posted March 11, 2004 I don't know. There was more story potential with Crusher. Her past history with Picard and Wes onboard the ship. I lliked the Pulaski character but I liked Crusher more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr.Picard 12 Posted March 11, 2004 PULASKI all the way!!!  I think she was cool, she was a bit like McCoy, that's what I liked about her. And - most important thing - she didn't have an annoying son. I thought the most important thing for you would be that Pulaski never was in love with Picard.  Well... Who knows if she wasn't? She admired him very much, that was said in "Unnatural Selection"...  Just kidding. Pulaski rules.    Mrs. Captain Picard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Valeris 2 Posted March 17, 2004 I think Crusher better. What I really did not like about Pulaski was that she had something against sentient computers. Besides, my mom looks just like Crusher and she sort of acts like her and she is a doctor too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Admiral Kirk 1 Posted March 19, 2004 Pulaski had her moments but I think Crusher certainly had a better bedside manner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain Bolivar 0 Posted March 19, 2004 Pulaski's character was much richer than Beverly's. Beverly was always rather passive and submissive; she was too stereotypical. Pulaski broke that mold. She was a strong and opinionated woman. I think her charcter is fantastic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stoned_vulcan 0 Posted March 19, 2004 Pulaski's character was much richer than Beverly's. Beverly was always rather passive and submissive; she was too stereotypical. Pulaski broke that mold. She was a strong and opinionated woman. I think her charcter is fantastic. yea she was strong, and too opinionated in my opiniion... i woodnt want her to be my doctor, she didnt seem to have a bedside manor, beverly seems much kinder, and more caring, and isnt that what you would want from a doc? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sman 0 Posted March 29, 2004 I think Crusher was better, for the reasons fenriz275 mentioned. I also liked the Pulaski character although I honestly believe that Pulaski was not around for long enough to really be considered 'part' of the crew, in the sense that whenever I think of the ST:TNG doctor, the first person who comes to mind is Dr. Crusher. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Turak 0 Posted March 29, 2004 where did this rash of Pulaski questions come from?? hehe obviously, it's Crusher. Pulaski was a waste of time : Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sheikhengku 0 Posted April 14, 2004 Bev Crusher is better than Pulaski :wacko: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tech 0 Posted April 14, 2004 I would have to agree with the majority and vote for Beverly Crusher. If only we had more time to explore Kate Pulaski's character, perhaps I might be more in her favour. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites