A l t e r E g o

Federation Vice President
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    21,123

  • Joined

Posts posted by A l t e r E g o

  12. Posted

    Ok, The "accident theroy could still work.

    and this accident happened when and where that effected the whole empire?

     

    Why are you asking me like that?

    Hey, it is your baby, you mentioned it first;

    Posted on Mar 12 2003, 06:08 PM

     

    Lt. Commander

     

    Group: Ships Crew

    Posts: 133

    Member No.: 40

    Joined: 5-March 03

     

    the accident theory and the aristocrats theory are the two best in star trek lore. but the reason is, they just did it. It would put it to rest if they showed a normal one and a ridge head on Ent.

    --------------------

    Tiocfaidh ar La, Eireann go Brach

    C.J.M.A., Paddy Rolling Stone

    Quotes-

    "If you pretended to be Data then you are NOT old..." -VaBeachGuy

    "There is power in a factory, power in the land, power in the hand of the Worker. But it all amounts to nothing if together we don't stand, there is power in a Union" -Billy Bragg

     

    Ger 1:0 USA 21.06.2002

    (13 Ballack 39')

  13. Posted

    I'll just sit here and cry.. lol

    NO ONE WANTS A NEXT GEN MOVIe..

     

    -LAur

    That’s not true! I would want another NG flick but it is not practical, they have all be come to expensive. Come-on, BUCK-UP Trekette! You are not the first person to lose a fav to economics, try to begin focusing on the other series and what possibilities that lies with them.

    I'm Sorry!

  14. Posted

    Put to rest? I do not think that would put it to rest and here is why, the question of why they had never been seen after TOS would be raised and more fuel would be poured on the ENTERPRISE controversy. The ENT doubters would say it is just more reason to get rid of Rick Berman for screwing up Trek.

     

    Ok, The "accident theroy could still work.

  15. Posted

    the thing i heard that makes sense to me is that the ones on TOS are of a higher prestige than the ones with the ridge in the forehead. so the plain looking ones would be your aristocrats, and the others are the warrior race, but the real reason is makeup cost, and just simply Gene rewrote there role, to show the clear difference between them and humans, and later on that even though they look different they still get along. does that answer your question? :D  :D

     

    I love that explanation pogue, truly I do and I wish that idea had been incorporated into the mythos but I have yet to figure out if that is true then how/why did 3 Klingons that appeared on TOS without ridges later appear on DS9 with ridges?

     

    Was their status somehow taken away from them? No because when they appeared on DS9 their Honor was intact.

  16. Posted

    did you make it to the one the had in DC, Alterego, at the air and space museum in 1992 i think it was that was great. I saw the Star Trek: The Adventure exhibition in London on CNN when it opened and it does look cool, yet another reason i need to travel to London  :)  :)

     

    Nope, never been there. Navada would be about 2,000 miles closer to us than DC would be.

     

    Always seems the great attractions are never a short trip away from us. Even Trek Cons stopped coming to our town cause of lack of attendance :D and the closest Con we could ever have a chance to visit would be in LA. Calif.

  18. Posted

    OOOOOHHHHHHHH, my original post, i forget about that thing, i gotcha, it was just an out of context quote that took me a few beats to get what you were talking about. of course i know the federation isn't estabished yet, it was just my review of the episode where it delt with prequel-y things

    :D Busted! :) Yeah, you got me but it took you long enough :)

  19. Posted

    "as well entry into the federation."

     

    I thought The Federation did not exist yet?

    wha-!!??

    Why the shock? Didn't you know the FED does not exist yet in the current timeframe of ENT?

     

    That is why all of the episodes have been dealing with the kind of subject matter they have, the Prime Directive has yet to be written.

  21. Posted

    How about this theory...

     

    Although they are not a military org. by definition, they understand many (Ok, most) of the aliens they encounter do have true Mil orgs.

     

    It is there fore prudent for Starfleet to look like a military org. so the Aliens encountered will understand the language of implied force even if that is not the goal of the Contact in the first place.

     

    I don’t know, just thinking out loud... what do you think, plausible?

  22. Posted

    For me, the end of this series had better be a launching pad for a trilogy (at least) of films that are not put together willy-nilly but are carefully crafted masterpieces. If they can do that, I would probably consider my appetite for ENT appeased, and could begin looking forward to the next project on the horizon. 

    that would be a great re-vitalizing factor for star trek. plus, release them like lotr with one every year (just film all three in advance). actually even if they dont it will kick *buttocks*

    Thanks!

     

    The key for the films sucesses is in the PLANNING PLANNING! PLANNING!

    If they focus on the planning and composure of the films, they could become the Trek box-office smashes of all time!

  25. Posted

    THANKS GABE! MAN THESE BOARDS ARE SMOKING! i CAN BARLY KEEP UP WITH ALL THE NEW POSTS, THEY APEAR LIKE POP-CORN SOUNDS....

     

    POPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOPOP!

     

    THANKS TO ALL THE MEMBERS WHOM ARE MAKEING THIS SITE HUUUUUUM!

     

     

    :) :) :) B) :) B) B) B) B) B) ETC.. :D