Theunicornhunter 2 Posted February 20, 2004 Did anyone else notice when the Trill were first introduced in TNG - it was like a surprise to everyone. Yet in DS9 Trill had supposedly been in Star Fleet for some time...at least long enough to have Trill attending Star Fleet Academy. If they'd really been around that long shouldn't the officers on the Federation Flag ship know about them? Anyway, always bugged me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Captain Jean-Luc Picard 1 Posted February 20, 2004 It's not a continuity error, it was a purposeful change. I see it as no different as the new look of the Klingons in the first movie. :lol: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Phaserman 0 Posted February 20, 2004 There are many discontinuity issues in Star Trek. Considering, though, how many hours there are of Star Trek as far as TV and Movies go, it is IMPOSSIBLE for a writer to know every minute detail. they are bound to flub something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Klingonmike 0 Posted February 20, 2004 I always wondered why the Trills on TNG looked so different than the Trills on DS9, the ones on TNG had no spots and high eyebrows, unlike Jadzia and Ezri who look mostly human except for the spots. The Klingon change I can understand, but not the look of the Trills. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
