Sign in to follow this  
Captain Jean-Luc Picard

Saucer Seperation

Recommended Posts

Saucer seperation or other forms of starship seperation. Do you think any ships, besides the Galaxy-class, can do so?

 

Constitution-class - Kirk orderred Scotty to prepare to do so in TOS "The Apple".

Galaxy-class - TNG & ST-7

Prometheus-class - VOY "Message in a Bottle"

 

Do you know of any other ship designs we've seen or you think can seperate?

I think the Miranda, Excelsior, and Sovereign-class can saucer seperate.

 

I'd like to add that I think there's three reasons for saucer seperation: using saucer as one massive escape pod instead of letting the entire ship be destroyed, sending the civilians and morajority of crew to safety durring extreme combat, or a method of strategic maneuverring with multiple targets making it easier to attack the enemy.

Edited by Captain Jean-Luc Picard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not aware of any other ship designs that can separate the saucer section. I do think it's a great feature that comes in handy sometimes. I especially like the Prometheus' multi-vector assault mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope no ships, only the one you have meantioned. The Consitution cn but cannot reconnect. Before anyone says it Voyager cannot nor E-E, they are called lines for the bulkheads on the ship, all the ships have them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, in theory, the Constitution-class can seperate, using the saucer as an emergency escape vehicle versus escape pods. However, the stardrive section can be reconnected to the saucer in spacedock.

 

As for Voyager, I agree, it's a small, solid ship. As for the Enterprise-E, why couldn't it seperate, eh? John Eaves had designed the ship to be capable of saucer seperation in case a future movie had called for such an act. You can clearly see a v-shape seperation line where the engineering hull meets the saucer, making the quantum torpedoe launcher and captain's yacht the front of the battle section.

 

I tried to find a pic online, but had no luck. The designer, John Eaves, designed the ship to be "capable" of saucer seperation, but we may never find out. I allways assumed that if the Enterprise-E could saucer seperate, it would be more of a tactical strength since the battle section has no impulse engine, or possibly in the way of the Constitution-class, jettisonning the stardrive section and flying off to safety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure many ships in the STAR TREK franchise are capable of one-time seperations, in a last ditch effort to save a bulk of the ship, with a space dock neccessary for reconnection. I wonder how many can seperate and reconnect on their own though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

galaxy class and

prometheus or the only current ships that can saucer-sep, officials from Utopia Planitia say that more are on the drawing board. With experimental trials set to resume on 40 different classes of ships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
galaxy class and

prometheus or the only current ships that can saucer-sep, officials from Utopia Planitia say that more are on the drawing board.  With experimental trials set to resume on 40 different classes of ships.

How do you know only the Galaxy & Prometheus-class can seperate? Also, what source says 40 more class designs are on the drawing boards? I thought Starfleet only came out with one class at a time, not to mention we don't have any new adventures in the late 24th century.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my source is the Utopia Planitia - and the 40 new designs are due to the mounting pressure between the Romulans, the Cardassians, the Klingons and the Ferengi. Starfleet needs to expand their fleet, and as such new classes need to be tested.

 

There have been 40 failed prototypes, now they are back in the design stage, with fatal flaws being wheened out at the Warp testing complex on Mars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Utopia Planitia is the shipyards orbiting Mars. There is also the Luna shipyards, however these are for SOL system defense craft (the Peregine fighter) and minor upgrades to ship systems. In the Beta Antares system is the Beta Antares shipyards, a little more well defened than Utopia Planitia due to its lack of Peregine fighters. The U.S.S. Prometheus was built at Beta Antares fleet yards, while the U.S.S. Voyager was built at Utopia Planitia.

 

McKinley station, which serviced the ENT-D, after the devastating Wolf 359 attack - "Best of Both Worlds and Family TNG season 3/4" orbits Earth also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

um :o um :) non-canon extension of the post-Nemesis era.

 

So you could call it canon, until another series comes out and stuffs it all up..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I'm not saying you're wrong, fan fiction is cool and all, it's just that I don't consider anything off-screen to be canon, both books and fan-fiction.

 

However, I am interrested in your site. It's very cool. :)

 

Oh, and the reason why I don't consider books and fan-fiction to be canon, is becuase there's too much to keep up with. :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but theres nothing after Nemesis .... so for all you know - it could become canon...

 

"Always keep an open mind, there are always possibilities"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, in theory, the Constitution-class can seperate, using the saucer as an emergency escape vehicle versus escape pods.  However, the stardrive section can be reconnected to the saucer in spacedock.

 

As for Voyager, I agree, it's a small, solid ship.  As for the Enterprise-E, why couldn't it seperate, eh?  John Eaves had designed the ship to be capable of saucer seperation in case a future movie had called for such an act.  You can clearly see a v-shape seperation line where the engineering hull meets the saucer, making the quantum torpedoe launcher and captain's yacht the front of the battle section.

 

I tried to find a pic online, but had no luck.  The designer, John Eaves, designed the ship to be "capable" of saucer seperation, but we may never find out.  I allways assumed that if the Enterprise-E could saucer seperate, it would be more of a tactical strength since the battle section has no impulse engine, or possibly in the way of the Constitution-class, jettisonning the stardrive section and flying off to safety.

I'll have look at the ship again but I dought it. Heck I will even post a picture for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It may of only been showing you what it would look like seperated. If you look at the underside of the ship, it comes too far up the middle. The stardrive is and saucer is linked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is interesting but I thought the main purpose of saucer separation on the Enterprise D was too evacuate the noncombatants to a safer location while the battle section goes off to to take care of business. I always thought that the Enterprise E was built mostly as a combat vessel so that having a saucer separation function such as D's would be unecessary. I think E's separation mode must be for using the saucer as a big life boat. This is all my conjecture so I'm probably wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, in theory, the Constitution-class can seperate, using the saucer as an emergency escape vehicle versus escape pods.  However, the stardrive section can be reconnected to the saucer in spacedock.

 

As for Voyager, I agree, it's a small, solid ship.  As for the Enterprise-E, why couldn't it seperate, eh?  John Eaves had designed the ship to be capable of saucer seperation in case a future movie had called for such an act.  You can clearly see a v-shape seperation line where the engineering hull meets the saucer, making the quantum torpedoe launcher and captain's yacht the front of the battle section.

 

I tried to find a pic online, but had no luck.  The designer, John Eaves, designed the ship to be "capable" of saucer seperation, but we may never find out.  I allways assumed that if the Enterprise-E could saucer seperate, it would be more of a tactical strength since the battle section has no impulse engine, or possibly in the way of the Constitution-class, jettisonning the stardrive section and flying off to safety.

if memory serves, on the constiution class ships, the impulse exhaust was on the secondary hull...such that in the even of emergency separations, they would be left without propulsion and primary and secondary power...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Captain if you look at the Enterprise-D you will note that it is no V nore of a C. Note the top of the V its the small Captains Yahat? The E-D could because its a large vessel carring families. The E-E has no families aboard. Not all ships would have the same capablity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, in theory, the Constitution-class can seperate, using the saucer as an emergency escape vehicle versus escape pods.  However, the stardrive section can be reconnected to the saucer in spacedock.

 

As for Voyager, I agree, it's a small, solid ship.  As for the Enterprise-E, why couldn't it seperate, eh?  John Eaves had designed the ship to be capable of saucer seperation in case a future movie had called for such an act.  You can clearly see a v-shape seperation line where the engineering hull meets the saucer, making the quantum torpedoe launcher and captain's yacht the front of the battle section.

 

I tried to find a pic online, but had no luck.  The designer, John Eaves, designed the ship to be "capable" of saucer seperation, but we may never find out.  I allways assumed that if the Enterprise-E could saucer seperate, it would be more of a tactical strength since the battle section has no impulse engine, or possibly in the way of the Constitution-class, jettisonning the stardrive section and flying off to safety.

if memory serves, on the constiution class ships, the impulse exhaust was on the secondary hull...such that in the even of emergency separations, they would be left without propulsion and primary and secondary power...

You are correct. See, the crew would evacuate to the saucer section, abandoning the engineering section, so they can fly off to safety in the event of a warp core breach for example.

 

Woops, I thought you said primary hull, not secondary hull.

Edited by Captain Jean-Luc Picard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Captain if you look at the Enterprise-D you will note that it is no V nore of a C.  Note the top of the V its the small Captains Yahat? The E-D could because its a large vessel carring families. The E-E has no families aboard. Not all ships would have the same capablity.

When I said the "V" shape, I was referring to the Enterprise-E, not the D. Yes, the "V" point, includes the forward quantum torpedoe launch and captain's yacht, making that module the front of the battle section. Keep in mind that the Prometheus doesn't have families either, yet it has multi-vector assault mode. So, we've seen ships that can seperate for reasons "other" than taking civilians and majority of crew to safety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, in theory, the Constitution-class can seperate, using the saucer as an emergency escape vehicle versus escape pods.  However, the stardrive section can be reconnected to the saucer in spacedock.

 

As for Voyager, I agree, it's a small, solid ship.  As for the Enterprise-E, why couldn't it seperate, eh?  John Eaves had designed the ship to be capable of saucer seperation in case a future movie had called for such an act.  You can clearly see a v-shape seperation line where the engineering hull meets the saucer, making the quantum torpedoe launcher and captain's yacht the front of the battle section.

 

I tried to find a pic online, but had no luck.  The designer, John Eaves, designed the ship to be "capable" of saucer seperation, but we may never find out.  I allways assumed that if the Enterprise-E could saucer seperate, it would be more of a tactical strength since the battle section has no impulse engine, or possibly in the way of the Constitution-class, jettisonning the stardrive section and flying off to safety.

if memory serves, on the constiution class ships, the impulse exhaust was on the secondary hull...such that in the even of emergency separations, they would be left without propulsion and primary and secondary power...

Actually on Constitution class ships the impulse exhaust is at the aft portion of the primary hull, that way they still had some propulsion in case of separation. Of course, I don't have a handy pic to post as proof, but just look at that part of the ship next time you get a chance...it's kind of like the two impulse exhausts on the Galaxy class saucer section, but together in the middle of the aft section.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Captain here is a picture of the underside, note that the V doesn't do to the end? well here it is just click on the link die to my image being unable to shown here. LINK I have it circled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this