Sign in to follow this  
Kor37

New York Jury Rejects Rectal Exam Lawsuit

Recommended Posts

Don't touch me there: NY Jury rejects rectal exam lawsuit

AP

Posted: 2008-04-22 02:23:52

NEW YORK (AP) - A hospital did nothing wrong when it tried to examine the rectum of a construction worker who had been hit on the head by a falling wooden beam, a jury found Monday.

 

After deliberating for about an hour, a state Supreme Court jury awarded nothing to Brian Persaud, who sued NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital for unspecified damages. The panel found the hospital and its emergency room medical staff were not liable.

 

Persaud's lawyers, Gerard Marrone and Gary DeFilippo, said he might appeal.

 

"We're very disappointed," Marrone said after the two-week trial. "It's a miscarriage of justice."

 

The hospital's lawyer, Jeffrey Lawton, declined comment.

 

Marrone said Persaud, 38, was injured while working at a construction site in midtown Manhattan on May 20, 2003. Persaud received eight stitches for a cut over his eyebrow at the hospital, but denied emergency room staffers' request to examine his rectum, the lawyer said. He said doctors told Persaud the exam could help determine whether the accident caused spinal damage.

 

When Persaud resisted, staffers held him down while he begged, "Please don't do that," Marrone said. Persaud hit a doctor while flailing around, so the staffers gave him a powerful sedative and performed the rectal exam, he said.

 

Hospital witnesses testified at trial that the exam was never completed, but Marrone said that when Persaud woke up he was handcuffed to a bed and had an oxygen tube down his throat and lubricant in his rectum.

 

"He resisted because he didn't know what they were doing," DeFilippo said. "Once he said he didn't want the rectal exam, everything should have stopped."

 

DeFilippo said he believes the rectal exam was done as retaliation because his panicked client hit the doctor.

 

A judge dismissed a misdemeanor assault charge that was filed against Persaud because he hit the doctor.

 

DeFilippo said his client is unemployed and has been unable to hold a job since the accident.

 

Wasn't this a "Family Guy" episode?.... <_<

Who would have thought a construction worker would be such a wuss?..... B)

Seriously, though, this guy should have a case. I don't believe that a hospital can physically force you to have a procedure against your will. Isn't that why they have those consent forms for everything?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just what sort of rectal exam were they giving - I mean were they putting a scope in him? If they were worried about spinal damage why not do an xray?

 

Seriously, if people refuse medical treatment you are supposed to stop; to restrain someone - put a tube in their mouth so they couldn't talk and then proceed to do painful things to their lower half doesn't sound on the up and up to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He woke up handcuffed to the bed, tube down his throat and lubricant on his butt? Jeez, sounds like a date gone wrong, and no, I DON'T know that from personal experience <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He woke up handcuffed to the bed, tube down his throat and lubricant on his butt? Jeez, sounds like a date gone wrong, and no, I DON'T know that from personal experience <_<

It could have been worse.

 

There could have been NO lubricant on his butt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely think that he should have a case. After he told them that he refused the exam that should have been the end of it. At most they should have made him sign a paper stating that he refused the exam and allowed him to leave. This would have removed any liability from them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He woke up handcuffed to the bed, tube down his throat and lubricant on his butt? Jeez, sounds like a date gone wrong, and no, I DON'T know that from personal experience <_<

It could have been worse.

 

There could have been NO lubricant on his butt.

Or he could have woken up at one of the staff's homes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this