Wishfire 2 Posted November 9, 2004 (edited) I think that the Terminator movies could possibly be a (completely unintentional) prelude to the Matrix movies. Think of it... They both have to do with future wars between human and machines. What do you think? Edited November 9, 2004 by wishfire Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
He Who Shall Not Be Named 2 Posted November 9, 2004 The theme of mankind being taken over by artificial intelligence is probably as old as artificial intelligence itself. I'm not surprised you found similarities. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wishfire 2 Posted November 9, 2004 I was referreing to how well the two story-lines can go together. Like, Terminator could have taken right before the torching of the sky mentioned in the Matrix. I mean, the events depicted in the Terminator (the future parts) could lead up to that event. And then they took red pill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
He Who Shall Not Be Named 2 Posted November 9, 2004 Don't think so. Judgement Day would have tourched the sky. After that John Connor won the machine war. Skynet's goal was the complete extermination of mankind and the Matrix's goal was to keep some of us alive. What would have been more interesting is, in the Terminator, what would Skynet have done if the machines had won the war? After you control all of the planet and have wiped out your enemies, what then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wishfire 2 Posted November 9, 2004 I don't remember Connor winning the war, but then again it's been a long time since I saw T2. But you got to consider, in the Matrix the machine's original goal was to destroy all of mankind. It wasn't until after the sky got torched that they needed an alternative energy source and realized that humans made just that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cougar 0 Posted November 9, 2004 They are secretly related...... LOL! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
He Who Shall Not Be Named 2 Posted November 9, 2004 I'm not sure if The Animatrix is considered canon, but in that it explains how we basically put up a smokescreen to block the sun. This was the scorched sky Morpheus referenced in The Matrix original. Nukes weren't used until some time later. In T3, however, we see the nukes used an hour after Skynet is given sentience. Skynet launched the nukes (at least the US nukes), not mankind. So the two futures aren't compatible after all. In one mankind uses the nukes. In another the machines do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wishfire 2 Posted November 10, 2004 Sheesh, take everything seriously, why don'tcha? I was trying to be at least half-way silly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stephen of Borg 2 Posted November 10, 2004 I love both trilogies, but when I saw the Matrix I told a lot of people about how it was just like watching another version of the Terminator for the reason you said, man vs. machine in the future, and the machines are winning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ddillard 2 Posted December 19, 2004 I think that this has become a very old theme Man creates machine, machine becomes sentient and believes man is an infestation, man and machine battle for control. It just shows the possibility of letting technology go to far without maintaining control. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HRH The KING 0 Posted December 19, 2004 I still think Terminator had a better stroy. "The Matrix" was simply too pretentious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sea trooper 0 Posted December 19, 2004 I've said before that Star Trek is after the Terminator series. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WEAREBORG4102 0 Posted December 21, 2004 It is interesting that you point that out considering the philosophies are quite the same. Are we in control? Is it reality? What can come from artificial intelligence? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wishfire 2 Posted December 21, 2004 It is interesting that you point that out considering the philosophies are quite the same. Are we in control? Is it reality? What can come from artificial intelligence? 290935[/snapback] Here's an even better question to tie in with those... Do we really want to know? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites