FISSION OR FUSION........

[Jeanway 0]

Which is better, theoreticallly?

Edited April 19, 2004 by Jeanway

[edmcgon 0]

Fusion creates less radioactive waste and more energy.

[WEAREBORG4102 0]

Fusion. Clean, efficient and very powerful.

 

antimatter and matter is even better....

[Jeanway 0]

From what I've read, antimatter does sound better

[scaleman 0]

Ed's right, i'd go with fusion. But a photon bomb would be better.

[ARMS 0]

A light bomb?

[Jeanway 0]

EEEWWW, a LIGHT BOMB. Now that sounds interesting. ::walks of muttering to herself:: :huh: ::pulls out touchpad from pocket and makes notation::

[Jim Phaserman 0]

Fission=Nuclear weapons

 

Fusion=Hydrogen weapons.

 

the power difference is astounding. an H-bomb can be up to 15 or 20 megatons, and could take NYC to it's foundations. also, a Hydrogen bomb was tested at Tinian Island, and it obliterated the Island. Fusion is a more powerful weapon by far, but does not make it better. in fact, when it comes to these weapons, it's best if they aren't used.

[Rivendells_king 0]

How about we get rid of nuclear power and stuff like it and live in trees and live in peace with nature.

[Odie 0]

How about we get rid of nuclear power and stuff like it and live in trees and live in peace with nature.

That would be nice if we could live in the trees. I don't see many wanting to live in a tree. Nuclear power is not going away anytime soon. In fact, I believe it will grow faster when we run out of fossil fuel.

Edited April 21, 2004 by Odie