TJ Phaserman

Trivia Leader
  • Content Count

    4,184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TJ Phaserman


  1. well not really. i mean to me reed was the type of character that has secrets that he would want to keep a secret. but to make him an agent of section 31 was something done a bit too early, probably best if they saved the plot for season five, but they had to go all out for episodes during the series finale. however, reed is the type of man who enjoys secrets....and to get things done when he's ordered to. kinda reminds me of bashir just a bit.


  2. ok, the only bajorian officer serving on the defiant was kira. but that was only because she was the first officer until worf came along and took over the first officer duties. the bajorains stopped using the solar sail ships as far as anyone knows. i mean they never once stated they had warp ships. all they had were impluse ships. either for transports or military purposes. as for no other klingons wearing sashes, but as far as i can remember gowron taking power of the high concil, i've noticed in the begining of part 2 of that episode, his brother kurn also wore one. as for any other klingon for that matter, unless they were a head of the house, or a goverment officer, they did not wear a sash


  3. no, they were picking a new kai by the series finale, but, during the sixth season, sisko had bajor pull it's application from the federation because of impending doom from the pah-wraiths and the dominon. and gummy i do love that book. shakkar didn't offically sign in bajor to be a part of the federaton about 4 months after sisko left with the prophets. the federation were only allies to a certain extent. meaning the federation were the only ones that had the power to stop the cardassians, klingons, or even the ferengi from taking over bajor. not to mention seenig how bajor was still a somewhat under-developed species, (because they had no technology of their own) the federation couldn't meddle in bajoran affairs. but they could only assit if anything happened on the station, or if they were threatened from like the jem'hedar or the cardassians.


  4. A question for the wrestling fans here. Would you want me to post spoilers concerning storylines or would you rather be surprised? Let me know.

     

    dude, i don't really mind. i mean if lawer is going to ECW then im gonna be pissed. they've done too much to raw since the beginning of the year to screw everything up.


  5. This is true. They are investigating the WWE's drug policy and why these wrestlers are dying despite the fact that the policy is in place. I doubt it will amount to anything.

     

    Yeah i suppose your right...you cant really prove the WWE are responsable for the actions of wrestlers out side the ring.

     

    SNME was not bad (better then whats been on tv the last few weeks) Austin looks in great shape i guess he is slowing down with the six packs :roflmao: ...i hope he is planning to return,the fans where chanting his name 10 mins after he left the ring :roflmao:

     

    I am gonna watch Raw now so i will give my reactions later.

     

    well he is still active on the raw roster. however he's not wrestling due to unconfirmed reports


  6. now that cruise is going to be in this movie, now i know im as sure as hell am not going to see this movie...the last thing trek needs a psycho, christan bale look a like, scienctalogest (however you spell it) family conceling, contract binding, manic. i'd go on, but i fear that the US Goverment will hunt me down to no extent.

     

    I'm pretty certain they won't give Mr. Cruise a chance in the movie where he preaches the word of Hubbard.

     

    And don't be absurd. Of course you'll see the movie. You'll see it multiple times in the cinema then buy the DVD.

     

     

    it'll be a cold day in hell if i found out that he'll be in the damn movie. i wouldn't even buy the damn dvd. i'd probably use the dvd as targeting practice, the same way i did to nemisis.


  7. well if there will be a DS9 movie first, they would have to use the dialouge from the book Star Trek DS9: Unitiy

    If they do any kind of Star Trek TV movie, it should really be a DS9 movie featuring the return of Sisko. But why do you think that they would have to use anything from "Unity"? The books are non-canon and ultimately mean nothing in regards to the TV show other than a good read.

     

    unity is sisko's return....and worfs...odo...o'brien...the jem'hadar...


  8. Usually, a direct to tv movie is terrible and just a waste of time, name one direct to tv movie that was good, and faithful to the original it was based on.

     

    not to mention they killed off trip in the last episode. if anything, they'd do a movie before he dies and before the xindi attacks earth. but i don't see a movie for enterprise happening not now, not ever....unless bakula agrees to it.