Quark

The Founders
  • Content Count

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Quark


  1. I had not noticed but now that you mention it, more of that insufferable change I guess... :lol:

     

    Perhaps it has something to do with almost all novels released today being a part of a mini-series, books in mini-series have individual numbers so maybe maintaining a separate # sequence (a # for the book and a # for the book in a series) would only cause more confusion?  B)

    True. But I was just refering to the TOS books that are independent, and not having books that continue.


  2. In the long series of TOS books, all the books, or at least most of them, were always numbered. For some reason now, they stopped numbering them. Why? :P And now, the TOS books are now, Star Trek: The Original Series books? B) I mean, why not just continue the good old series of Star Trek books and reach to at least the 100th book? That would just be a land mark. But no, they had to end the original TOS books with #97 "In The Name of Honour", which is actually pretty good. But still, they should continue the numbered books. :lol: