Ships Crew
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About BKY1701

  • Rank

Contact Methods

  • AIM
  • MSN
  • Website URL
  • ICQ
  1. So they shouldn't chase criminals that go 100 MPH? Then all criminals will go 100 MPH.
  2. Could have been worse; it could have been a real one.
  3. I won't be getting any bluray drives, not a big fan of Sony... Actually we got an HDDVD player, after it had become apparent it 'lost', mainly because it was only 70$, came with 2 movies on HDDVD and can play regular DVDs better. The prices came down a lot. You know, due to this fact, theres still a chance of HDDVD coming back from the grave. One can hope.
  4. Now we know of somewhere to send furries, and they'll like it, too. I, for one, am very pleased with this. :biggrin:
  5. Is anyone surprised? I mean, last time they tired, it didn't work out well. They may as well stay home.
  6. Tea has tannins, so drink strong black tea with grape juice.
  7. I have never heard of something this insane. This is ridiculous!
  8. I know someone that THINKS he is. Actually 3. But no, not really.
  9. 3 in California. None large, one was mistaken for a truck driving past.
  10. Just how do you know how dogs move when they're flying through the air? Dogs move a lot. I am not an animal person, but even I know this first hand. The dog does not move once in the whole video. That screams "fake" to me. Maybe if I could see a higher res version of it, but youtube quality is just too low to tell anything.
  11. Really sucks he only rolled a 2 on that fortitude check.
  12. Not to be contrary to outcry that I would love to support, but that doesn't look like a real, live dog. It doesn't move at all, doesn't seem to be breathing, etc.
  13. Sounds like they would be right, then. How many billions has Bush wasted in Iraq? Oh wait, you don't agree Iraq was a waste of money? It's all in the eyes of the beholder. There are quite a many stupid laws that are not enforceable, for many reasons, including being unconstitutional, impossible to enforce and pointless. How is this any more worthy of having federal funding cut off? Oh right, because it's a statement against Bush. And any statement against Bush should be countered as strongly as the law allows- if not more so. Heres what's funny: doing so would most likely not be legal. By what legal reasoning would said funding be cut off? "You made me mad"? "You wasted some money"?
  14. Try Pidgin/Gaim (they are the same thing).
  15. Unfortunate, because there is a big difference. But just more, typical statistical weaseling. Statistics, studies and surveys only mean as much as their subjects, the exact data sought and who arranges them... this study fails at least the first.