BKY1701

So, did the driver hava glazed look on his face?

 

Seriously, the police should be reprimanded for recklessly endangering the public. No stolen vehicle, even one full of donuts is worth chasing at 100 mph. You're seriously in danger of killing someone at those speeds.

So they shouldn't chase criminals that go 100 MPH? Then all criminals will go 100 MPH.

Could have been worse; it could have been a real one.

I won't be getting any bluray drives, not a big fan of Sony...

Actually we got an HDDVD player, after it had become apparent it 'lost', mainly because it was only 70$, came with 2 movies on HDDVD and can play regular DVDs better. The prices came down a lot. You know, due to this fact, theres still a chance of HDDVD coming back from the grave. One can hope.

Now we know of somewhere to send furries, and they'll like it, too. I, for one, am very pleased with this. :biggrin:

Is anyone surprised? I mean, last time they tired, it didn't work out well. They may as well stay home.

TUH, wine does have things that grape juice lacks, particularly tannins. Those are the items that does show heart health.

Tea has tannins, so drink strong black tea with grape juice.

I have never heard of something this insane. This is ridiculous!

I know someone that THINKS he is. Actually 3. But no, not really.

3 in California. None large, one was mistaken for a truck driving past.

As far as i am concerned, this movie is a fake. The dog was not trying to run in the air, as it would do if it were thrown. Also, the dog doesn't move at all through the whole movie. and if you look after he throws it, as it is flying threw the air, it moves wrong. it goes end over end, instead of flying sideways, upways, downways, anyways... a real dog would move itself around quite a bit, not just stay still, especially if it was a puppy. Also, i can't see its eyes... to me, i think its fake.

 

Just how do you know how dogs move when they're flying through the air?

Dogs move a lot. I am not an animal person, but even I know this first hand. The dog does not move once in the whole video. That screams "fake" to me.

Maybe if I could see a higher res version of it, but youtube quality is just too low to tell anything.

Really sucks he only rolled a 2 on that fortitude check.

Not to be contrary to outcry that I would love to support, but that doesn't look like a real, live dog. It doesn't move at all, doesn't seem to be breathing, etc.

It's a waste of taxpayer money (which IMO is criminal) if it lacks any legal basis.

Sounds like they would be right, then. How many billions has Bush wasted in Iraq? Oh wait, you don't agree Iraq was a waste of money? It's all in the eyes of the beholder.

But to waste the taxpayers time and money to make a "personal" statement that lacks legal authority is not one of those options.

There are quite a many stupid laws that are not enforceable, for many reasons, including being unconstitutional, impossible to enforce and pointless. How is this any more worthy of having federal funding cut off? Oh right, because it's a statement against Bush. And any statement against Bush should be countered as strongly as the law allows- if not more so.

Heres what's funny: doing so would most likely not be legal. By what legal reasoning would said funding be cut off? "You made me mad"? "You wasted some money"?

Try Pidgin/Gaim (they are the same thing).

The study did not differentiate between documented immigrants and illegal immigrants.

Unfortunate, because there is a big difference. But just more, typical statistical weaseling. Statistics, studies and surveys only mean as much as their subjects, the exact data sought and who arranges them... this study fails at least the first.

Borax lowers the melting temperature of iron.

I think I read about this process (or similar) being used in ancient times to make ice. The exact device maybe, but I don't think the concept is new.

Somehow I don't think this will affect the idea that science is geeky.

In other news, Kentucky declares fried PETA it's official picnic food.

I mean, it's better to eat humans than chickens, right? And what better group, they should be happy to be eaten!

Ron Paul, Obama, 3rd party; in that order.

Paul is unfortunately unlikely, Obama stands a chance. I wouldn't feel comfortable voting for Hillary, McCain or Huckabee, so I may as well vote someone who won't win, if only as a statement.

What, do they want to kill the restaurant business? That's like keeping rich people out of the stock market!

Barack Obama - 21%

Hillary Clinton - 20%

Ron Paul - 18%

Mike Gravel - 15%

John McCain - 15%

Mitt Romney - 10%

Mike Huckabee - 7%

20% for Hillary? Excuse me while I throw up...

Other than that, it's fairly accurate. Obama and Paul are my 2 favored choices and I don't really like anyone other than them... I wouldn't touch Huckabee with a 10 foot pole, so I don't know where that came form.

They also didn't ask about a few things I care about - namely the internet, patents/copyright and nuclear power, all 3 I care very strongly about.

I am voting Neral/Sela, seems to be the most honest ticket this year.

I've actually thought to myself a few years ago that smoke detectors could be turned into a small bomb type thing, could be used for terrorists.

Not all isotopes are equal. Any terrorist trying to build a nuclear weapon out of Americium-241 will experience the exact same results as this guy- looking like an idiot. Acquiring a useful amount would probably be more difficult than getting the Plutonium normally used- there isn't much of the stuff in smoke detectors. Even then, I never heard of a nuke using Americium. Given it's name, it may be quite ironic if it in fact WERE used by terrorists someday...